Key Point

The Gleason score tells you how aggressive the cancer looks under the microscope. Grade Group 1 (Gleason 6) is the least aggressive — most of these men do not need immediate treatment. Grade Group 5 (Gleason 9–10) requires prompt definitive treatment.

In this article
  1. What the Gleason score measures
  2. How the score is calculated
  3. Grade Groups — the modern classification
  4. What your grade means for treatment
  5. Other factors alongside Gleason grade
  6. Questions to ask your urologist

Your biopsy report has come back with a Gleason score. Perhaps it says "Gleason 3+4=7" or "Grade Group 2." These numbers are among the most important pieces of information in prostate cancer diagnosis — they describe how aggressive the cancer is and guide every subsequent treatment decision.

Understanding your Gleason score does not require a medical degree. This article explains exactly what it means in plain language.

1. What the Gleason score measures

The Gleason score is a pathological grading system developed by Dr. Donald Gleason in the 1960s. It describes how abnormal the cancer cells look under the microscope compared to normal prostate tissue — and this abnormality predicts how aggressively the cancer is likely to behave.

Normal prostate cells have a regular, organised arrangement of glands. As cancer develops, these cells lose their normal architecture — they become less organised, more irregular, and progressively more difficult to recognise as prostate cells. The Gleason system grades this disruption from Pattern 1 (near-normal) to Pattern 5 (completely disorganised, no glandular structure).

Why Gleason 1 and 2 are never reported

In practice, Gleason Patterns 1 and 2 are never reported in biopsy specimens — they represent near-normal tissue that is not reliably cancer. Modern reports begin from Pattern 3. This is why the lowest Gleason score you will see on a biopsy report is 3+3=6 (Grade Group 1).

2. How the score is calculated

The Gleason score is the sum of two pattern numbers:

These two numbers are added to give the total score. For example, if the most common pattern is 3 and the second most common is 4, the Gleason score is 3+4=7. The order matters — a 3+4 tumour is less aggressive than a 4+3 tumour, even though both add up to 7.

Common Confusion

"My Gleason score is 7 — same as my friend's." But his is 4+3 and yours is 3+4. These are meaningfully different.

The Reality

A 3+4=7 has a dominant lower-grade pattern. A 4+3=7 has a dominant higher-grade pattern. The first number is the most important — it tells you which pattern predominates.

3. Grade Groups — the modern classification

Because the Gleason scoring system was confusing (Gleason 6 sounds like the middle of a 2–10 scale, but it is actually the lowest possible biopsy score), the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) introduced a Grade Group system in 2014. Most reports now include both.

GG1
Gleason 3+3=6
Lowest risk. Well-organised glands. Very low metastatic potential. Active surveillance is an option for many.
~97% 15-year survival
GG2
Gleason 3+4=7
Favourable intermediate risk. Mostly lower-grade with some higher-grade pattern. Active surveillance sometimes possible.
~90% 15-year survival
GG3
Gleason 4+3=7
Unfavourable intermediate risk. Predominantly higher-grade pattern. Treatment generally recommended.
~77% 15-year survival
GG4
Gleason 4+4=8
High risk. Aggressive pattern. Definitive treatment — surgery or radiation — strongly recommended.
~53% 15-year survival
GG5
Gleason 9–10
Highest risk. Very aggressive. Prompt multimodal treatment required. Often includes hormone therapy alongside definitive treatment.
~29% 15-year survival

4. What your grade means for treatment

Grade Group 1 (Gleason 6)

This is the lowest-risk prostate cancer detectable on biopsy. Many urologists now debate whether Gleason 6 should even be called "cancer" — it has essentially no metastatic potential and the vast majority of men with this grade will die of something else entirely. Active surveillance — monitoring with regular PSA, MRI, and repeat biopsies rather than immediate treatment — is now the standard of care for most Grade Group 1 patients.

Grade Group 2–3 (Gleason 7)

Intermediate-risk disease. Treatment is generally recommended for GG3 and often for GG2 in younger patients. The choice between robotic surgery and radiation is based on tumour volume, patient age, bladder/sexual function concerns, and patient preference.

Grade Group 4–5 (Gleason 8–10)

High-risk disease requiring prompt treatment. Surgery (RARP with extended lymph node dissection) or radiation with hormone therapy are the standard options. Staging investigations — CT, bone scan, or PSMA PET — are essential to confirm disease has not spread before local treatment.

5. Other factors alongside Gleason grade

The Gleason grade is the most important single factor — but it is not the only one. Risk stratification for prostate cancer uses several variables together:

Molecular risk testing

Genomic tumour tests (such as Prolaris, Oncotype DX Genomic Prostate Score, Decipher) analyse the tumour's genetic profile and can refine risk stratification beyond Gleason alone. These are particularly useful in Grade Group 2 tumours where the decision between active surveillance and treatment is not clear-cut. Discuss with your urologist whether these apply to your case.

Questions to ask your urologist
  1. What is my Grade Group — and what does it mean for treatment options?
  2. Is my overall risk low, intermediate, or high — based on PSA, stage, and grade together?
  3. Am I a candidate for active surveillance given my Grade Group?
  4. Should I have a genomic tumour test to refine my risk?
  5. Does my Gleason grade affect nerve-sparing eligibility at surgery?
  6. What staging investigations do I need given my grade and PSA?
Medical Disclaimer

This article is for general patient education about the Gleason grading system. Risk stratification and treatment decisions require individual assessment by a qualified urologist. Survival statistics are population-based estimates and do not predict individual outcomes.